Miller On The Future Of Communication
![](http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4427/835/400/Miller%20On%20The%20Future%20banner%20art.jpg)
As posted earlier (Henry Miller Cuts a Record), Miller was recorded to disk while reading his work in 1949. After reading a excerpt from The Colossus Of Maroussi called New York, Miller then went on to speak freely for ten minutes about the recording session and about the future of the written word and creative human communication.
Much of this ad-lib has recently been (roughly) transcribed on a blog called Drip And Spew(thanks for the inspiration to make my own post). You can listen to Miller's speech on Ubuweb's Henry Miller page: just click on New York and forward it to timecode 11:37.
THE MONOTONY OF ONE'S OWN VOICE
MICROPHONE ANXIETY
At 13:51, Miller talks about the psychological factors involved in speaking into a microphone: "you have the feeling that there are millions of ears out there" and this creates an anxious physical response. He goes on to compare the act of writing to the "direct contact" of speech, which creates a danger of "failure" if it doesn't immediately "register" with its audience.
"Don't do it over the microphone! Do it at home. Do it alone. Do it on the typewriter, but don't try and speak it, because you'll only become a sort of ham actor. You're only echoing yourself and it's a paradoy and a travesty." [15:30]
THE IMPERSONAL CONTRAPTIONS
Miller speaks about a paradox in the fact that the recording medium is impersonal yet personal. He goes on an amusing little technophobic rant about creepy "contraptions" and "aparatus" ("his ears are all plugged up!") and how one must "get clear of that maze" of wires in order to believe that what he's saying is registering with the audience.
Henry then clues in that this is similar to the leap of faith the writer must take when he writes in isolation. Still, he talks about words as if one's creativity with them is only increased through the act of writing ("you can paint with them, you can use them musically"); it's all very ironic, considering that people used to encourage Henry to write the way that he spoke.
THE POSSIBLE USES OF BLOODY MACHINES
"This damn thing has it's own laws and I'm only beginning to get it now." [17:50] Henry gradually considers the potential of the medium, suggesting that speeches could be written specifically for it [an anachronistic idea, really, considering the 20 years of radio that preceeded this rant]. He also likes the idea of recording great conversations with friends and adversaries on "this bloody machine" in order to be able to refer to them.
At 21:20, he talks about the two types of men he enjoys most: The Pantomimist (i.e. clowns) and The Talker (especially burlesque comedians and Danny Kaye).
THE FUTURE OF THE WRITTEN WORD
"This whole experiment has gotten me to thinking and believing more strongly than ever that we're not going to be reading books very many more years. It wouldn't surprise me that in another 50 years there won't be any more books. We'll have this direct communication with one another. We might not even have to talk into a microphone then. We might not need records or tape or anything. We might have that wonderful thing happen, like a miracle, and I can see it happening, that when a man feels like creating he'll just create and maybe he won't even open his mouth. But it will register. And it will register on everyone and it won't be exclusive. You won't have to buy a book or join a club or any of that sort of thing. The real spontaneous, creative act will be communicated universally, simultanously, instantaneously. That would be a wonderful thing. [22:00]
TODAY I SEE A MILLION USELESS WORDS
"And now we're in a sort of intermidiate stage. We're breaking away from that cold dead print which is full of phony stuff." Quite a turnaround of thought here, but that's Miller for you. " I've written a lot of words--millions of words I guess--and I think today more than ever in my whole life I realize how uselsss and unnecessary were a lot of those words. Certainly when I repeat them [in a recital] I see that they don't belong. They weren't necessary." [23:10]
He then goes on to champion the men who can charm and "hypnotize" through the direct use of language, by voice. Far above the modern text writers, Miller places high on a pedestal the ancient storytellers like Homer: "those wizards who had the verbal faculty. Let's get back to that, that's what I say."
"OK Louie, that's all."
Now that's what I call a 360-degree reversal.
3 Comments:
Hi,
Great post as usual. I was very amazed when I found these recordings myself and thoroughly enjoyed listening to them, in the mornings, on the train going to work etc.
The "turnaround anarchronisticisms" which are so typical of Henry Miller is great though! That's what I feel is the lasting attraction of his writings: the fact that he could get so passionately opinioned and delusional about something, is great and refreshing, and the fact that he goes off in another direction a couple of pages later - hell, that is in a strange way, almost logical (as well as entertaining).
Unfortunatly I don't know any French so the joy of hearing Louis Ferdinand Celine's recording (also on Ubeweb) wasn't quite as terrific as it could have been!
Tony G, UK
Thanks Tony. I think Miller's contradictions lie in his quest for The Truths, which are often paradoxial, contradictory, grey, to be found in varying degrees on all sides of all debates.
cheap jordan shoes
mlb jerseys
ugg boots
coach outlet
michael kors handbags
ugg boots
nike factory outlet
michael kors handbags
coach outlet online
louboutin shoes
20170812
Post a Comment
<< Home